Existing COP Tool:
Cost Savings: Improving service code configurations to minimize services being executed incorrectly or unnecessarily. - Every service execution costs money.
Reducing Call Center Call Volume: Streamlining workflows and implementing user-friendly interfaces to facilitate the efficient setup of client profiles and minimize errors, reducing the reliance on call center support.
Before starting any design work, it was crucial to define the MVP to outline the key functionalities and features necessary for Phase 1 which also involved identifying any constraints.
Upon engaging in conversations with the target users initially defined by the user stories, we realized that they don't actually use the tool to onboard clients. We investigated and redefined our target users to realign our design decisions to better meet the needs and behaviors of our actual users.
With the insights on how the system is being used and what users struggle with, the other Designer and I took different approaches to find solutions. While the other designer pursued a design that involved a complete restructuring of the layout to accommodate a more future-oriented self-onboarding experience for clients, my focus was on ideating designs & flows that aligned closely with our existing state.
Backup plan when proposing a new solution: Collaborating with another designer on this project not only enabled us to explore diverse problem-solving approaches but also emphasized the need for a backup plan. Recognizing the constraints and potential risks, I ensured that I had an alternative design solution ready to mitigate any unforeseen challenges. This proactive approach provided a safety net and allowed for a smoother execution of the project, ultimately contributing to its overall success.
Understanding the goals of the product team: Recognizing the importance of aligning with the product team's objectives was a crucial takeaway from this project. While I was focused on delivering innovative and user-centered designs, it was equally important to understand the product team's priority of shipping the product within a specific timeline. By maintaining a balance between design thinking and practicality, I ensured that my design solutions aligned with the project's timeline, avoiding any potential blockers and enabling a smooth progress towards the product's release.
Design in academia vs. real-world work: One notable takeaway from my experience was the difference between design in academia and design in a professional work environment. In academia, the focus often lies on exploring theoretical concepts and pushing the boundaries of creativity. However, in the real-world work setting, design must also consider practical constraints, such as technical feasibility, budget limitations, and business goals. It was essential for me to adapt my design approach to the realities of the industry, ensuring that my solutions were not only innovative and user-centric but also feasible and aligned with the project's objectives. This shift in mindset highlighted the importance of balancing creativity with practicality in order to deliver effective and impactful design solutions in a professional context.